🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as among the deadliest – and momentous – dates during multiple decades of violence in the region.

Within the community where events unfolded – the legacy of that fateful day are displayed on the walls and seared in public consciousness.

A civil rights march was conducted on a chilly yet clear afternoon in Derry.

The demonstration was a protest against the policy of internment – imprisoning people without trial – which had been put in place after multiple years of unrest.

Military personnel from the elite army unit shot dead 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a overwhelmingly republican population.

A specific visual became particularly memorable.

Images showed a Catholic priest, Father Daly, displaying a stained with blood white handkerchief in his effort to defend a crowd moving a young man, Jackie Duddy, who had been killed.

Journalists captured considerable film on the day.

The archive includes Fr Daly informing a reporter that military personnel "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no justification for the shooting.

The narrative of events was disputed by the original examination.

The Widgery Tribunal concluded the military had been attacked first.

Throughout the peace process, Tony Blair's government set up a new investigation, following pressure by bereaved relatives, who said the initial inquiry had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the report by the inquiry said that on balance, the soldiers had initiated shooting and that not one of the casualties had presented danger.

The then Prime Minister, the leader, expressed regret in the House of Commons – declaring killings were "improper and inexcusable."

Authorities started to examine the matter.

A military veteran, referred to as Soldier F, was charged for murder.

He was charged concerning the killings of one victim, 22, and twenty-six-year-old another victim.

The accused was further implicated of trying to kill several people, Joseph Friel, further individuals, an additional individual, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a legal order maintaining the soldier's identity protection, which his legal team have maintained is necessary because he is at risk of attack.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had solely shot at persons who were carrying weapons.

That claim was dismissed in the concluding document.

Information from the examination would not be used immediately as proof in the legal proceedings.

During the trial, the veteran was hidden from public behind a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the first time in the hearing at a session in December 2024, to answer "innocent" when the allegations were put to him.

Kin of the deceased on that day travelled from the city to the courthouse every day of the case.

A family member, whose relative was fatally wounded, said they always knew that hearing the case would be emotional.

"I visualize the events in my mind's eye," John said, as we walked around the key areas referenced in the case – from Rossville Street, where the victim was killed, to the nearby the courtyard, where the individual and William McKinney were died.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I helped to carry Michael and put him in the vehicle.

"I went through every moment during the testimony.

"But even with experiencing the process – it's still worthwhile for me."