🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional member states